Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to delete and flush buffer. No buffer to delete or flush in /home1/ntptuqmy/public_html/quotes/includes/header_html.php on line 6
Herman Kahn Quotes - IQDb - Internet Quotes Database

Quotes from Herman Kahn


Sorted by Popularity


A healthy and fully functioning society must allocate its resources among a variety of competing interests, all of which are more or less valid but none of which should take precedence over national security.


New developments in weapon systems during the 1950s and early 1960s created a situation that was most dangerous, and even conducive to accidental war.


I am against the whole cliche of the moment.


There was no race - but to the extent that there was an arms competition, it was almost entirely on the Soviet side, first to catch up and then to surpass the Americans.


The objective of nuclear-weapons policy should not be solely to decrease the number of weapons in the world, but to make the world safer - which is not necessarily the same thing.


Many people believe that the current system must inevitably end in total annihilation. They reject, sometimes very emotionally, any attempts to analyze this notion.


In a world which is armed to its teeth with nuclear weapons, every quarrel or difference of opinion may lead to violence of a kind quite different from what is possible today.


For if enough people were really convinced that growth should be halted, and if they acted on that conviction, then billions of others might be deprived of any realistic hope of gaining the opportunities now enjoyed by the more fortunate.


A total nuclear freeze is counterproductive - especially now, when technology is rapidly changing and the Soviets have some important strategic advantages.


A surprising number of government committees will make important decisions on fundamental matters with less attention than each individual would give to buying a suit.


I'm against sloppy, emotional thinking.


I'm against ignorance.


I'm against fashionable thinking.


Human and moral factors must always be considered. They must never be missing from policies and from public discussion.


Anything that reduces war-related destruction should not be considered altogether immoral.


My guess is that nuclear weapons will be used sometime in the next hundred years, but that their use is much more likely to be small and limited than widespread and unconstrained.


Because of new technologies, new wealth, new conditions of domestic life and of international relations, unprecedented criteria and issues are coming up for national decision.


Deterrence itself is not a preeminent value; the primary values are safety and morality.


It is immoral from almost any point of view to refuse to defend yourself and others from very grave and terrible threats, even as there are limits to the means that can be used in such defense.


Hopefully, nations will refuse to accept a situation in which nuclear accidents actually do occur, and, if at all possible, they will do something to correct a system which makes them likely.