Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to delete and flush buffer. No buffer to delete or flush in /home1/ntptuqmy/public_html/quotes/includes/header_html.php on line 6
Richard Armitage Quotes - IQDb - Internet Quotes Database

Quotes from Richard Armitage


Sorted by Popularity


I think, as a general matter, clearly, the United States globally supports the development of democracy and the democratic yearnings of all people.


There are ways to pursue political change. In a democracy, it's through the ballot box. There are other ways, and many democracies have many different systems of democracy.


The campaign against terrorism is going to be global and it's going to be long and there's reason to expect there will be difficulties along the way.


We know that after September 11, there were still terrorists around. We do get continuing information that they're intent on causing some damage and harm to not only U.S. interests but allied interests.


U.S. assistance provides the Jordanian government needed flexibility to pursue policies that are of critical importance to U.S. national security and to foreign policy objectives in the Middle East.


There is a growing recognition about China as a power in the ascent, and there is a question out there about what China will do with their new ascension.


There are many countries who have traditionally sponsored terrorism. Iraq is one, though it appears the majority of the terrorism committed by Saddam Hussein is on his own citizens. Iran in this regard. Syria, with their close support of Hezbollah, is noteworthy in this respect.


The development of weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to carry them would be a very destabilizing effect, should Iran be able to accomplish that.


Secretary Clinton has dramatically changed the face of U.S. foreign policy globally for the good. But I wish she had been unleashed more by the White House.


I think that Vietnam, many of us who served in Vietnam thought that was very wasteful, and to what end? To what end? What were we really there for? What were we really fighting for?


I think that although we say we don't want to be the policeman of the world and et cetera, when 911 is dialed, it's the United States that has to answer the call.


Whenever you're out of town, no matter modern communications, you feel a little bit out of touch.


What could be better in al-Qaeda's mind than to have India and Pakistan going at each other? What more to further their aims?


We've had Saudis and Jordanians and Pakistanis who have - and Syrians - who have been involved in armed attacks against coalition forces in Iraq.


Iran has interest in seeing that the Shia population of Iraq basically adhere to a line that comes from Iran.


I value my ability to keep state secrets.


The war we are fighting today against terrorism is a multifaceted fight. We have to use every tool in our toolkit to wage this war - diplomacy, finance, intelligence, law enforcement, and of course, military power - and we are developing new tools as we go along.


I think what Osama bin Laden does is to take the fact that some peoples lack hope and lack opportunity, and twist it to his own ends.


I think most conflicts do end with negotiated settlements; some don't, but most do.


I must say I've rarely been described as 'diplomat.'